Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Model Lead Based Paint Risk Assessor Practice Test

Which statement is true about areas that have been mouthed by a child?

1. They are often safe from lead exposure

2. They require a detailed economic assessment

3. They should be examined for potential lead hazards

4. They are typically found in higher socioeconomic neighborhoods

The correct answer is: They should be examined for potential lead hazards

The statement that areas mouthed by a child should be examined for potential lead hazards is true because children have a higher risk of lead exposure from ingestion or contact with surfaces that may have lead dust or paint. When children mouth objects or surfaces, they can inadvertently transfer lead-containing substances into their mouths, which poses serious health risks, including developmental issues and poisoning. Therefore, it is critical to assess these areas for lead hazards to ensure the safety of children and prevent any harmful exposure. The need for examination in areas that have been mouthed aligns with public health guidelines that prioritize the protection of children, especially in environments where lead is known to be a risk. Regular inspections and risk assessments in such scenarios are essential elements of maintaining a safe living space for children.